|
Post by arrestman on Jan 22, 2008 20:42:35 GMT -5
This question is for Edge. What happened to the 45/70 project? Did you ever try sabotless again? Could you thread the chamber for a breech plug? I know these are a lot of questions but NEF has a new stainless heavy barrel in a nice looking thumb hole stock for 2008 in 45/70. I would like to try this if you think it would shoot sabotless OK.
|
|
|
Post by edge on Jan 22, 2008 21:54:50 GMT -5
I have not shot much since hunting started in September. We have about 3 more weeks and then I'll start experimenting again. I have not shot much sabotless at all with any rifles since my main goal has been to shoot a rifle bullet at rifle velocities accurately for hunting. It is funny that you ask, because I just found my knurling tool that I had experimented with in the past and have decided that I will attempt to make it a bit more precise. While sabotless is not high on my list, I will resize some bullets and give them a try in the next month or so. I must admit that I was much more gung ho on the project before I pulled, no yanked, no struggled with the so called "Trigger". The trigger is the only drawback to this project, and someday I'll work on that too. edge. This question is for Edge. What happened to the 45/70 project? Did you ever try sabotless again? Could you thread the chamber for a breech plug? I know these are a lot of questions but NEF has a new stainless heavy barrel in a nice looking thumb hole stock for 2008 in 45/70. I would like to try this if you think it would shoot sabotless OK.
|
|
|
Post by PPosey on Jan 23, 2008 12:01:05 GMT -5
Thread a factory 45/70 to take the breachplug? Thats interesting, get the depth of the breachplug right for a good primer strike and that part should be OK if there was enough metal left around the plug, would the chamber area be a problem? I mean would the powder take up the chamber and throat area so that the bullet or sabot would still be in the rifling?
|
|
|
Post by edge on Jan 23, 2008 12:20:04 GMT -5
If you are willing to give it up as centerfire rifle, then a short threaded breechplug "should" be ok depending on the barrel contour. The standard contour does not leave a lot of extra material past the standard cartridge so any breechplug length pushes the bullet toward the thinner section. Here was the breechplug that I use now, and since there are no threads it does not compromise the barrel integrity, and makes switching back and forth fairly simple.: dougva.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=Savage&action=display&thread=1181955534edge.
|
|
|
Post by PPosey on Jan 23, 2008 14:10:18 GMT -5
Asooo grasshopper,,, sure that would not be legel in NC though as It can be converted to a 45/70, would have to be a breachpoug that screwed in.
|
|
|
Post by edge on Jan 23, 2008 15:55:27 GMT -5
Asooo grasshopper,,, sure that would not be legel in NC though as It can be converted to a 45/70, would have to be a breachpoug that screwed in. Not to argue, but a game warden would have no way to tell. You can't get the breechplug out in the field unless you have a steel range rod. Once you fire this the breechplug needs a mallet to be removed. I suppose they could confiscate it, but I don't see why they would suspect that it was removable and still be able to load a cartridge. If I took this to the limit, an Encore can shoot a cartridge too. edge. PS Why did you call me an Asooo ;D
|
|
|
Post by arrestman on Jan 23, 2008 16:08:13 GMT -5
Edge, If you go to NEF or H&R web page you can get a pretty good look at this new rifle. I'm not sure but I think the barrel will be heavier than the one that you used. Thanks for all your input.
|
|
|
Post by edge on Jan 23, 2008 16:21:10 GMT -5
From the looks of it, a threaded breechplug would probably work. I would like to see the actual barrel dimensions, but it sure looks doable.
edge.
|
|
|
Post by PPosey on Jan 24, 2008 8:13:22 GMT -5
The Game Wardens here in NC tend to pounce and then look for details. and ohhhh do they stress the details, If it were pinned in then it would be ok I'm betting. Very interesting concept though,,,, putting a breach plug in that heavy barrel sounds real neat. But I'm all for lighter barrels.
|
|
|
Post by edge on Jan 24, 2008 8:51:16 GMT -5
SNIP If it were pinned in then it would be ok I'm betting. SNIP Hmmmm..... now you have me thinking ( always dangerous)! Why not use a removable locking ring, like a "C" clip? 45-70 may not be ideal, but a belted magnum would be good, or perhaps a rimless cartridge and put the locking member where the groove goes on the cartridge!! It could even be a short screwed in section as long as it does not change the headspacing. Back to the drawing board, I am liking this idea even more....thanks edge.
|
|
|
Post by PPosey on Jan 24, 2008 12:10:30 GMT -5
Yes a short screw in pin would be fairly easy to position in the ejector indent of a rimless case if that indent was mechined into your plug, or ya could leave the plug streight sided and put a channel through the same area on one side for a drive in pin or a longer set screw to go across the side of the plug. A pin or plug could recieve some hard pressures though.
|
|
|
Post by edge on Jan 24, 2008 12:46:37 GMT -5
SNIP A pin or plug could recieve some hard pressures though. If designed properly it should see no pressure at all. Remember that these are full lock-up firearms. As long as the headspace is correct the pin or threaded piece is only along for the ride. My breechplug is the identical size and shape as a 45-70 cartridge and the rifle locks up tight to the module as if it were a cartridge. Obviously this would not work as a ML-II mod since there are no locking lugs. edge.
|
|
|
Post by PPosey on Jan 24, 2008 13:11:02 GMT -5
Thats true it would simply be there to satisfy the law, not sure if it would in NC though as long as that barrel could still be used for regular 45/70 ammo after the plug was removed.
|
|
|
Post by PPosey on Jan 24, 2008 13:28:18 GMT -5
I just went over the online regs and could not find where a removable breech plug would not be legal in a gun that could still fire normal ammo but I'd be real leary.
|
|
|
Post by arrestman on Jan 24, 2008 20:43:42 GMT -5
I don't want to upset any rabbit sheriffs so I'll let you guys figure that one out. I'm going to make a threaded plug for mine. If its a total loss then NEF will put another barrel on for around $150.00. Its still cheaper than the $600.00 I was about to spend on hand lapped shilen barrel. I checked on the price for one of these and it would run about $360.00. I'll do the hand lapping myself if needed. Edge what about a 9/16" OD breech plug? Would that be enough since the 45/70 case is around 1/2"?
|
|
|
Post by PPosey on Jan 25, 2008 11:52:31 GMT -5
Just last night I finally looked at the photos of edges plug and module, can't load images here at work they are filtered,,, Why did you not make the plug in the complete shape of the case, rim, primer holder and all and not have the rear of it to be a cut off 45/70 case? I'm sure there is a real good reason that I am ignorant of,,, I envy you guys with the know how to create these plugs on your own, I can tap a third action bolt hole, rechamber a savage centerfire and bed the action but thats about it.
|
|
|
Post by edge on Jan 25, 2008 12:11:22 GMT -5
arrestman, 9/16 will be fine depending on what length you make it and what material you use. A 9/16 diameter cartridge will need to hold back against about 12,000 pounds of force assuming a 50,000 psi load. PPosey, the breechplug is Ampco bronze and if you look closely you will see that the "Module" is the base of a 45-70 cartridge cut down and bored to accept a 209 primer. When I open the action the module is removed automatically. It is very nice to have a nice big module while hunting. You can prime and deprime using gloves easily without fiddling with just a 209 primer edge. I may make a new breechplug that uses a 223 cartridge/ 25 acp or something. But then I need to modify my extractor...we shall see when I get the time....
|
|
|
Post by PPosey on Jan 25, 2008 15:36:35 GMT -5
I see and yep that would be very nice escpecially for in the field
|
|
|
Post by edge on Jan 27, 2008 9:58:50 GMT -5
SNIP. I'll do the hand lapping myself if needed. SNIP I forgot to address this earlier. Handirifle barrels have VERY shallow rifling! It is only about 0.003 deep so I would be slow to lap these. You will also find that they are tighter at the breech than the muzzle . IMO, with some fiddling with loads they can be very accurate...but you WILL want to work on the trigger. Graybeards has some very good tips on trigger work and someday I will fix mine edge.
|
|
|
Post by slufoot on Jan 30, 2008 20:59:35 GMT -5
Hey Edge, great project and very interesting! I've got a Handi-Rifle with two barrels, a 45-70 and a 500 S&W. I would love to convert the 500 to a muzzle loader. I've got access to lathe and can make a breech plug for it but my problem is the bore size. The bore on this rifle is to small for an MMP 3 petal EZ sabot and a .451 Speer 260 grain bullet. Do you or anyone else have any suggestions of how I can get a properly sized projectile down the bore of this barrel. I slugged the barrel and the lands and grooves measure .492 and .501. What size bullet would I need to load sabotless? I don't think I'm going to be able to use a sabot with this bore size but I could have LEE make a custom bullet sizer if I knew what size would work for sabotless shooting. All help will be greatly appreciated!
Thanks! Slufoot
|
|
|
Post by edge on Jan 30, 2008 21:44:09 GMT -5
slufoot, unless you have tried the sabots, I would not give up.
When I bought my Krieger barrel I assumed that I could not shoot regular sabots either. My barrel is .495/.505, but it is lapped. It shoots 250 grain bullets very fast with regular short MMP sabots.
I suspect that the crush rib sabots will probably work, but don't know for sure.
I have not shot enough sabotless to say what is the best size. I tend to think that making a small bullet and then knurling to fit seems to work. Remember that Handi barrels tend to be tight at the breech and looser at the muzzle. This would tend to make tight bullets that load OK at the muzzle very hard to fully seat.
edge.
|
|
jon
Spike
Posts: 32
|
Post by jon on Feb 1, 2008 11:50:55 GMT -5
I've been watching the handi-rifle conversion. I'm interested enough that I ordered a thumb hole ss ultra hunter in 45 70. Since i now am laided off for medical reasons I don't have access to the machines at work. I would be interested in purchasing a b/p and a couple of modules for when it arrives. It atleast has a 24 in.barrel although It is only supposed to have a 1/20 twist. Maybe not perfect but it should be fun to work with. Any help would be appreciated. Thankyou in advance. Jon
|
|
jon
Spike
Posts: 32
|
Post by jon on Feb 2, 2008 2:43:28 GMT -5
Edge, I like your handi-rifle project enough that I ordered a new ss ultra hunter thumbhole. I've been laid off at work for medical reasons so I don't have the availability of the machines. But I have a little time to shoot. Would you be willing to sell one of your b/p and say 6 modules for the 45 70? I would then have something to use while the savage barrel cooled. I could then see how I like a 45 before I get into either a ruger #1 or a better longer barrel for the handi-rifle. Thanks for any input. Jon
|
|
AJ
Eight Pointer
Posts: 123
|
Post by AJ on Feb 2, 2008 8:15:40 GMT -5
NEF does have the 450 Marlin barrels that have a belted case. Here are the case specs.
|
|
|
Post by edge on Feb 2, 2008 11:38:03 GMT -5
Jon, I wish that I could say yes to all of the requests that I receive, but I am not in the modification business. The next few months are our busiest time of the year and we run 2 shifts and Saturday overtime just to keep up. I can't even get on a machine to make things for my own rifles let alone for others. A couple of weeks ago I agreed to thread some 4140 for someone to make their own breecgplugs and I still have not been able to do that simple task!
The Handi conversion is not quite as simple using my breechplug as I may have first let on. It can't be a mix and match as it must be headspaced for the individual rifle.
I have another design that eliminates this need, but I am back to not having a machine to make it on. I may try an alternative quick fix, but not right away.
If you want to test muzzleloading with the Handi, then cut a dowel and place it in the chamber. load the bullet till it hits the dowel. Remove the dowel and load a cartridge without a bullet, but with a fiber wad. You will need a powder that fill the case completely.
The handi rifle 45-70 has a VERY short throat, only about 0.100 so the base of the bullet will be hanging out by this distance.
edge.
|
|
jon
Spike
Posts: 32
|
Post by jon on Feb 3, 2008 5:56:20 GMT -5
Edge, thanks for the response. I can understand busy. I'm probably in almost the same kind of business. Now that I have sort of been forced into early retirement I tend to forget. As the rifle isn't even here yet I've hopefully got plenty of time. As I keep researching the handi-rifle I seem to be finding that since it is a relatively inexpensive weapon tolerances seem to be fairly loose. I have also heard that with some work it can be a fairly accurate piece. I still think it is a doable project and could be quite rewarding. Thanks for all the great info. Looking forwards to more follow up info when time is available. Jon
|
|
|
Post by edge on Feb 7, 2008 21:45:27 GMT -5
A couple of weeks ago I was at the range and the guy next to me was shooting a .223 He had some weird brass that was mainly plastic and the only real brass was the base section. Since he was throwing it away I took a few home. As I sat at my desk at work I thought that the base might make for a primer module for my 45-70 project. I don't have a lathe right now since the shop is too busy so I decided to modify a regular 45-70 case to accept these .223 case heads. What I came up with was to solder a copper plug in the base of the cartridge case. Then drill it and mill the end for the module. Drill for a vent bushing. The black marker on the 45-70 case will be milled away so that I can add an ejector for just the .223 module as the 45-70 case will remain in the chamber. If I ever finish this with the ejector, any game warden would see the ejector bar behind the breechplug case. At that point the breechplug could not be removed without removing the ejector. edge.
|
|
|
Post by arrestman on Feb 8, 2008 7:18:35 GMT -5
Edge, you will never cease to amaze me! This is a good idea and I believe it will work. I,m assuming that if the regular rifle primer won't work you can still modify it for 209's? Where is your source for the drill bushings?
|
|
|
Post by slufoot on Feb 8, 2008 7:47:04 GMT -5
Hey edge, I tried my 45-70 Handi barrel with a .452 Hornady 300 grain XTP bullet and it started down the muzzle and just as you stated it got tight about 2" before dropping through the chamber. I had a piece of brass rod that I cut to the same length length as a 45-70 case and dropped it down the barrel. I used 62 grains of H-4895, this is a Trapdoor load from Hodgdon, and then I put a 50 caliber roundball patch (this was all I had for a wad) down on top of the powder just to hold it in place, I used my short starter to get the patch in the case mouth. I setup my 45-70 Handi-Rifle in a "Scout style" configuration. It has a peep sight with a large aperature and a white post front sight and I mounted a 2x Leupold extended eye relief scope about half way down the barrel. This makes a great woods hunting rifle but isn't very good for bench work. Now that you know a little about my setup maybe you can understand why I was happy with my results. I setup a target at 50 yards and then dropped the case length rod down the barrel, inserted a Hornady 300 XTP and seated it against the rod (it gets tight just before contacting the rod). I made a mark on the ramrod so that I would know when I was fully seated. I then inserted the 45-70 case with powder and wad and closed the action. I fired 3 shots like this at 50 yards and to my surprise the group measured just under an inch. Kinda funny, but i've got a piece of 5/8 round tool steel and my thoughts are much like yours on a breech plug. I've taken measurements of my actual chamber and will make a breech plug to match it and use a Savage ventliner in the end and am thinking of drilling the breech end to take a 209 primer and mill the head of the breech plug to use a 22 Magnum extractor. I'm also thinking of reccessing the ventliner some to allow for powder but don't want to go too much because when the base of the 300 grain XTP is seated flush with the case mouth, it is just barely still engageing the rifling. How much powder space did you leave with the copper bushing you soldered in? Like you, I have to use the lathe at work when I can and I've been so busy I haven't had time to do it yet. Keep us posted on your progress.
GOOD SHOOTING! Slufoot
|
|
|
Post by edge on Feb 8, 2008 8:48:55 GMT -5
About 2 years ago a supplier had a big sale and I bought a few. Their quality was not as good as the United Bushings that I used several years ago. Slufoot, a once fired case will hold 5cc to the case mouth and mine holds 3.5cc Sounds like you are on your way to a fine shooting ML with the Handi edge.
|
|