|
|
Post by SW on Jul 4, 2004 22:47:31 GMT -5
 Food for thought for prospective owners of a new 10-ML-2. Last year I got my 2nd 10-ML -SS,plastic stock, non-accu trigger. I fire lapped it at a fair amt of expense $ wise and a great amt of expense time wise. Performance improved measurably. I got a laminated stock from Kevin Rayhill, had it pillar and glass bedded, Edward's recoil reducer, Sim's recoil pad, Leupold steel Weaver bases and Leupold QRW rings,very good scope, and a SSS competition trigger. I'm afraid to add up the cost. The rifle is very nice with virtually no recoil and is very accurate. I'm very pleased with the rifle; BUT had I to do it again, I'd get on the list for a Henry Ball version. I think it would be a lot more cost effective.
|
|
|
|
Post by grouse on Jul 4, 2004 23:28:05 GMT -5
Really nice report. Ya, it's pretty hard to beat a Savage that has been totally reworked and gone over buy the inventor. No hoping you get a good one. It will be from Henry Ball.  |
|
|
|
Post by DannoBoone on Jul 6, 2004 22:11:20 GMT -5
I added a mercury recoil reducer and a Simms pad to mine,
and what a kicker-reducer system it is!! It would be a good
addition to Henry Ball's Ltd Ed OR the regular one us po'
folk buy. ;D
|
|
Food for thought for prospective owners of a new 10-ML-2. Last year I got my 2nd 10-ML -SS,plastic stock, non-accu trigger. I fire lapped it at a fair amt of expense $ wise and a great amt of expense time wise. Performance improved measurably. I got a laminated stock from Kevin Rayhill, had it pillar and glass bedded, Edward's recoil reducer, Sim's recoil pad, Leupold steel Weaver bases and Leupold QRW rings,very good scope, and a SSS competition trigger. I'm afraid to add up the cost. The rifle is very nice with virtually no recoil and is very accurate. I'm very pleased with the rifle; BUT had I to do it again, I'd get on the list for a Henry Ball version. I think it would be a lot more cost effective. 
